Quick answer
Dom Pedro II stamp value needs the portrait issue, face value in réis, edge separation and condition. On 13 October 2026, Postal Filatelia displayed BRL 40 for a used 1866 500 réis and BRL 80 for a used 1881 100 réis, each with one in stock. These are different dealer offers, not realized sales or a family-wide range.[3][4]
Identify the emperor before comparing prices
Brazil Dom Pedro II stamp value depends on the portrait issue, denomination, separation and condition. The ordinary used offers recorded here are BRL 40 for one 1866 500 réis and BRL 80 for one 1881 100 réis, checked on 13 October 2026; these are dealer asks for different stamps, not a market range or a promise of what your album will sell for.[3][4]
Look for the emperor's portrait and copy BRAZIL or BRASIL exactly as printed. Do not assign every imperial Brazilian stamp to this portrait family. Earlier numeral designs and later numeral issues need separate identification. A portrait on an anniversary stamp is also not enough to establish a nineteenth-century printing. Keep the full design, denomination and format in the photograph before searching a price.
This guide covers the practical sorting problem rather than every plate, shade or paper variety. Begin with one loose stamp, a joined multiple or a whole envelope as a separate object. Record an unresolved identification as unresolved. An album label can suggest a catalog entry, but it should not override a contradictory visible design or separation.
Separate the 1866 perforated and 1876 percê issues
The 1866 series has seven denominations, 10, 20, 50, 80, 100, 200 and 500 réis. Selos do Brasil describes the 1876 percê series as the same designs with a different separation method.[2] NUMIS explains that the earlier plates were reused and that percê consists of successive small cuts between stamps.[1] The emperor's apparent age cannot by itself separate these two printings.
Inspect all four edges. Perforation removes small circles of paper; rouletting cuts slits without the same punched holes. Percê is the Brazilian collector term used in the sources. A rough edge or missing tooth does not automatically mean percê. Trimming, tears and damage can obscure the original separation. If the edge cannot be read, keep the issue provisional rather than choosing the more expensive description.
Use the perforation measurement guide for the physical gauge method. Measure the stamp, not a resized website illustration. The blank papers illustrated below are a schematic contrast, not reference specimens and not a calibrated gauge. They cannot establish the perforation of your stamp.

Recognize Barba Branca without using a beard as a date
Barba Branca means white beard. RHM's O Selo article discusses this distinct portrait series and explains that the previous percê issue reused the younger-looking portrait plates.[6] A pale-looking beard in a faded photograph is not sufficient identification. Compare the whole frame and value inscription with a catalog illustration, including the separation.
The RHM article calls the series 1877 and 1878; Klaseboer groups the white-beard stamps under 1878.[6][7] These are differing issue-group headings, not evidence that your cancellation is wrong. Avoid assigning a precise first-day date from this guide. Use the exact denomination's specialist entry when an issue date matters, and record a postmark date separately from an issue date.
RHM links the 260 réis denomination with the overseas letter tariff under the Treaty of Berne and notes the higher 700 and 1,000 réis values.[6] Those postal functions explain why different denominations exist. They do not convert face values into present collector prices or make the largest numeral automatically the most valuable item.
Compare small and large heads using design details
For the 100 réis small-head entry numbered 49 in NUMIS's RHM-derived text, the hair covers part of the ear and the pearl circle is complete. Its large-head comparison numbered 54 has uncovered ear detail and a 100 that interrupts the pearl circle.[1] Check those printed relationships together. A picture enlarged on a phone does not turn a small-head design into a large-head issue.
For the 50 réis comparison, NUMIS describes ten lines in the side tablets for the small head and eleven for the large head.[1] These are denomination-specific clues, not a rule for counting any background lines on any Pedro stamp. Heavy cancels, weak printing and blur can prevent a reliable count. Save a close-up beside the whole stamp and leave the type open if a required detail is invisible.
The genuine black 200 réis scan below is described by its Commons file as an 1866 issue, Yvert 28, with a mute cancellation.[8] It illustrates a real early portrait and complete scan, not either priced dealer stamp. It does not demonstrate the 100 réis small-head distinction, the gum, or the authenticity of a stamp in your possession.

Read réis separately from modern reais
The historic denomination is réis. The modern dealer prices in the table are Brazilian reais, currency code BRL, written R$ on the product pages.[3][4][5] Keep two fields in the record, denomination and asking price. A stamp inscribed 100 réis does not have a modern value of R$100. No historical-to-modern currency conversion is used here.
The orange large-head listing writes its face value literally as 10Rs and names RHM 52 and STW 62.[5] Preserve those catalog labels rather than interpreting 52 as a denomination or claiming it is Scott 52. The catalog-number guide explains why a number needs its publisher beside it. A seller SKU is a separate stock identifier.
Once the portrait, face value and edge method are recorded, a photo checker can help organize a proposed identification. Supply the whole front and a separate close-up of the decisive detail. It cannot establish paper thickness from a front photo or confirm gum hidden by a mount. Do not let a suggested number replace a physical comparison.
Drop a stamp photo here
Show the full stamp, every perforation, and as much front detail as possible in even light.
Check a Dom Pedro II identification
Use Stamp Value Identifier & Scan to save a proposed portrait group, denomination and separation, then ask follow-up questions. Available on iOS and Android with a free tier. Photo assistance is not authentication, grading or an official appraisal.
Compare these exact ordinary dealer offers
Postal Filatelia displayed BRL 40 for its used 1866 500 réis, seller catalog label 29 and SKU 243. The used 1881 100 réis, label 49 and SKU 247, displayed BRL 80. Each page said one in stock and offered an add-to-cart control on 13 October 2026; structured offers also named BRL and InStock.[3][4] No checkout or purchase was performed.
The BRL 10 orange 10Rs large-head offer is SKU 3148 in the product metadata, with RHM 52 and STW 62 in its description. It also said one in stock. Its text did not state used, mint, gum condition or a defect grade, so the table leaves condition unstated.[5] It is not a clean mint or used comparable merely because the page has a photograph.
All three are individual-stamp offers, not set prices. Shipping is excluded and the offer metadata marks valueAddedTaxIncluded false.[3][4][5] Check the seller's applicable checkout terms before treating these displayed amounts as a delivered total. There is no currency conversion, completed-sale evidence or buyback quote in this table.
| Listing and stock ID | Stamp and seller condition | Quantity | Displayed ask | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Postal Filatelia 29 / SKU 243 [3] | 1866 500 réis, used; no independent grade | 1 single | BRL 40 / R$40,00 | 1 in stock; InStock metadata |
| Postal Filatelia 49 / SKU 247 [4] | 1881 100 réis, used; no independent grade | 1 single | BRL 80 / R$80,00 | 1 in stock; InStock metadata |
| Postal Filatelia RHM 52 / STW 62 / SKU 3148 [5] | 1882 orange 10Rs, large head; condition unstated | 1 single | BRL 10 / R$10,00 | 1 in stock; InStock metadata |
Match condition instead of copying the highest number
The two used listings identify use but do not provide an independently verified grade, a back examination or a certificate in the text.[3][4] Ask for clear front and back photographs if a condition detail matters to your purchase. Do not silently upgrade used to fine used, or turn an absence of listed defects into proof that no defects exist.
Check thinning, folds, tears, staining, missing paper and repairs with the condition guide. Keep what you can see separate from what remains hidden. NUMIS notes that some later Casa da Moeda issues used fragile paper, fugitive inks and irregular perforation.[1] Uneven appearance deserves issue-specific examination, not an automatic rare-variety label or an automatic diagnosis from a screen.
Do not wash, bleach or recolor a stamp to make the portrait easier to identify. A faded image cannot establish a scarce shade. Preserve the unedited photograph and describe the uncertainty. The current prices are comparison leads for the described items, not percentages that can be applied to any damaged Pedro II stamp.
Keep cancellations and complete covers in their own comparison
The specimen scan has a mute cancellation rather than a readable town-and-date mark.[8] A readable place name on your stamp is a research lead, not proof of a premium. Use the cancellation guide to describe the mark before asking whether a specialist can identify it. Keep the portrait identification and cancel attribution as separate conclusions.
A stamp on a whole envelope belongs to a postal-history comparison. Photograph the address, all markings and the reverse without removing the stamp. The loose-single asks here do not value the envelope, its route or a multiple franking. A cancellation after the issue year is not inherently an error; postal use and printing dates answer different questions.
For an inherited album, keep blocks and covers intact while sorting confirmed singles separately from uncertain types. Do not divide a set or cover price among its stamps and then call the result an individual value. Quantity, attached context and condition must match before a price is comparable.
Do not authenticate a variety from a search result
Klaseboer's reference includes forged Pedro II designs and cutout lookalikes.[7] That is a reason to examine an unusual claim, not to label every imperfect example a forgery. A portrait match, an old cancellation or an attractive seller heading cannot authenticate paper, a rare subtype or a signature. Seek specialist examination when the identification materially changes the comparison.
The sources also disagree on the count of 100 réis types in the early issue. Selos do Brasil says three, while NUMIS's RHM-derived text says four.[1][2] This guide does not choose a universal count or certify an early 100 réis subtype. Use the current specialist catalog's definitions for the exact entry and retain the edition with your notes.
Record a suspected variety as a hypothesis and retain the physical evidence needed to check it. An unusual color on a compressed photo or a damaged edge is not a price observation. Before paying for authentication, explain to the specialist which denomination, separation or design feature is unresolved.
Build a checkable Dom Pedro II collection record
Save the country inscription, portrait group, face value in réis, separation, catalog publisher and observed condition together. Attach the full image and useful close-up. For a price comparison, add its URL, SKU, observation date, currency and quantity. Keep the orange 10Rs condition gap visible rather than filling it with a guess.
Stamp Value Identifier & Scan can suggest identification from a photo, answer follow-up questions and keep saved discoveries in a visual collection. Use it to organize the Pedro II groups before comparing prices. Its output is assistive research context, not official authentication, grading, certification or appraisal. A scan does not establish a hidden gum state or a completed transaction.
Install the app on iOS or Android with a free tier if that workflow suits your collection. Save separate records for the perforated early portrait, percê, Barba Branca and unresolved later head designs. Update an identification when a physical detail changes it, then seek a matching price. Do not carry a BRL 80 comparison into a different issue just because both stamps show the same emperor.
Frequently asked questions
How much is an ordinary Dom Pedro II stamp worth?
The checked used-single offers were BRL 40 for a 1866 500 réis, SKU 243, and BRL 80 for an 1881 100 réis, SKU 247, on 13 October 2026. They are different issues and retail asks, not a general range or realized prices.[3][4]
Is 100 réis the same as R$100?
No. Réis is the historic face-value unit. R$ on these dealer pages denotes modern Brazilian reais, BRL. Record denomination separately from collector price, and do not convert the printed numeral into a modern valuation.[3][4][5]
How do I distinguish 1866 from the 1876 percê issue?
The designs were reused. Inspect the separation, punched perforation holes versus successive small roulette cuts. A rough or trimmed edge needs further examination; the emperor's apparent age does not decide the issue.[1][2]
Can I compare the BRL 10 orange stamp with a mint example?
Not without more information. The listing identifies an orange 10Rs, RHM 52 / STW 62, SKU 3148, but does not state use, gum or defect grade. Its condition remains unstated in this guide.[5]
Does a small or large head depend on photograph size?
No. For the 100 réis comparison, NUMIS describes hair and ear details and whether the 100 interrupts the pearl circle. These are printed-design relationships, not the size of an enlarged photograph.[1]
Sources and further reading
Primary references and specialist resources used to prepare this guide.
- [1] NUMIS museum: portrait and separation identification
- [2] Selos do Brasil: 1866 and 1876 issues
- [3] Postal Filatelia: used 500 réis, SKU 243
- [4] Postal Filatelia: used 100 réis, SKU 247
- [5] Postal Filatelia: orange 10Rs, RHM 52 / STW 62
- [6] RHM O Selo: Barba Branca and postal denominations
- [7] Evert Klaseboer: Brazil designs and forgeries
- [8] Commons: 1866 used black 200 réis exact scan file




